Today another “Man-Made” global warming study is found to have flaws.  This should only be surprising to those who’ve invested part of themselves to the debate.  This should only be surprising to those who don’t believe that everything on the planet works in cycles.  You would almost have to believe that the planet was never warmer on average than in the last 100 years, but at the same time believe that its never been cooler.  These are the same kind of people who believe that everything that happens is because of Global Warming.  Its getting warmer? Man is the problem.  Large storms? Man is the problem.  Just like other religions.. Anything that happens is because or???? Name you thing.  How can you argue with that kind of “faith”?

This time it was withdrawn voluntarily.  This is a first, but it won’t be the last.  We’re already seeing the collapse of data from other sources including climate labs, Environmental Journals, climatologists, and even the UN.  It won’t be long before the trust of individuals who are proponents of global warming lose credibility… but it will continue to happen.

The science isn’t settled… despite how many times that’s stated.. Its not.. Sorry.  Just go back and restudy it and then people might believe you.  The fact that people feel the need to say man is causing it and not believe anything else is more in-line with faith.  Said another way.. You can never get someone who beilieves in thier religion to rationally change thier belief by talking to them.  People will eventually come to thier own revelations… or maybe they won’t.

The real crime and problem is suggesting people are stupid or ignorant if they don’t believe what you say.  Especially when you (as a believer) can’t prove your POV.  The US News has been practically ignoring this controversy while the British are on it big time.  The UK Guardian has even built a page to compile the fall of the Man-made Global Warming hoax. Hopefully you’ll find that its got a good mix of support and denial articles.  It is a fair page by my read.

What’s funny is all of the people who jump to defend the bad science with their souls.  You would think that people would be happy to prove that there were mistakes and that as studies fall, that this would be a cause for celebration.   Shouldn’t we be happy that the world is not warming (due to man)?  Why would anyone defend bad, or faulty science?  Perhaps we all might want to look into ourselves and ask that same question.  Why would I defend mistakes and bad science?

— Thanks for Visiting Kali Pinckney.com at www.kalipinckney.com..

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change comes out with assessments of what’s going on in the environment.  This is a United Nations document and it has long been believed to be completed by those who have political reasons for pushing a particular agenda.

IPCC has been slapped around since the theft and publishing of emails from a climate research center was found manipulating data.  It has been one issue after another based on the IPCC. whether it be about tree-rings, glacier recession, temperature data, the IPCC has proven itself unreliable and acting more political than scientific.  Even the Dutch are getting in on slapping the IPCC report for not correcting faults in its data.  China and India say they will not do anything the IPCC requests.  Much of Europe thinks the IPCC is great… so long as they’re not required to do anything.

The question is:  How come they’re getting slapped around the way they are?  The reason is because lies and miss-truths cannot withstand a barrage of real science.  Eventually the truth will always surface in science.  It is imperative to follow the established and indisputable Scientific Method (there are a few models that stand up).

The IPCC should be ready and willing to use science to produce its Climate Change report (period).  In science, you normally follow a process as opposed to what is going on with Man-Made Global Warming.  (1) Instead of step one; ask a question.  The question is determined to be a fact already.  (2) instead of two; do background research, we instead see people looking for research that SUPPORTS the fact in step number one.  (3) There is no need to construct a hypothesis in step three because it is already determined to be caused by man.  (4)  Step 4 is to test your hypothesis through experimentation.  But this step is not necessary since there is “consensus” that this is fact.  The truth is, it is too hard to do an experiment.  (5)  There is no need to complete step 5 since only facts in support of MMGW are considered in Step 2.  The conclusion has already been answered as per step 1.   (6)  Step 6;  Report your data, has already been done prior to step one since you went in with the idea that Man was causing Global Warming.

Its easy to prove something when you don’t have to do any research or determine what the cause is.  If you start out with the answer… it becomes easy to prove anything.  The scientific process is meant to help find possible answers to questions, not to prove that your answers was right.  This is NOT science, this is faith!

— Thanks for Visiting Kali Pinckney.com at www.kalipinckney.com..